Penify

Appearance

A Comparative Overview of LangChain, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen and More ​

Key Points ​

  • Research suggests LangChain, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, and OpenAI's Assistant API each offer unique strengths for LLM application development, with no single "best" choice.
  • It seems likely that OpenAI's Assistant API is ideal for quick, automated AI assistants, while LangChain and Semantic Kernel suit deep integration needs, and AutoGen excels in multi-agent systems.
  • The evidence leans toward combining frameworks for complex projects, given their evolving interoperability.

Overview ​

The landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving, offering developers multiple frameworks to build AI-powered applications. This comparison covers LangChain, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, and OpenAI's Assistant API, highlighting their features, strengths, and real-world use cases as of March 2025.

Framework Breakdown ​

Each framework serves distinct needs, making the choice dependent on your project's requirements. Below, we explore each one, including unexpected details like LangChain's recent focus on observability with LangSmith and AutoGen's community-driven innovations.

  • OpenAI's Assistant API: Streamlines AI assistant development with automation, but has cost and observability concerns. It's great for quick setups like customer support chatbots.
  • LangChain: Offers deep control and integration, now supporting multi-agent workflows via LangGraph, with strong observability through LangSmith. It's used in recommendation systems and database queries.
  • Semantic Kernel: Focuses on enterprise-grade solutions, with plans for agent interface abstraction, ideal for conversational agents in business processes.
  • AutoGen: Specializes in multi-agent collaboration, with real-world applications in task automation and content creation, driven by a large community.

Comparative Insights ​

This comparison reveals how each framework balances development ease, flexibility, and multi-agent support, with unexpected details like Semantic Kernel's stability focus and AutoGen's event-driven architecture updates in 2025.

Survey Note: A Comprehensive Comparison of LLM Frameworks ​

Introduction ​

In the dynamic field of Large Language Models (LLMs), developers have access to a variety of frameworks to build AI-powered applications. This survey note, as of March 1, 2025, provides a detailed comparison of four prominent frameworks: LangChain, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, and OpenAI's Assistant API. We will explore their key features, strengths, weaknesses, and real-world use cases, ensuring a thorough understanding for developers to make informed decisions.

Framework Details ​

OpenAI's Assistant API ​

OpenAI's Assistant API offers a streamlined approach to developing AI assistants within applications. As of 2025, it simplifies the development process by automating memory and context window management, making it ideal for rapid deployment.

An unexpected detail is its integration with Azure, expanding its reach for enterprise solutions, which may surprise developers expecting a more standalone API.

LangChain ​

LangChain, a leading framework, provides developers with greater control over AI applications, focusing on integration and extensibility.

  • Key Features:
    • Requires explicit configuration of memory and context windows, offering fine-grained control.
    • Offers SDKs to bridge AI models with existing code, with recent developments including LangGraph for multi-agent workflows (LangChain).
    • Extensible through plugins, tools, and connectors, with LangSmith providing observability features (LangChain - Changelog).
  • Strengths:
    • High flexibility in integrating with existing systems, suitable for complex applications.
    • Strong multi-agent support via LangGraph, enhancing its versatility (Releases · langchain-ai/langchain).
  • Weaknesses:
    • More manual configuration may increase development time compared to automated options.
    • Initially focused on single-agent scenarios, though multi-agent support is now robust.
  • Real-World Use Cases:

An unexpected detail is LangSmith's role in observability, providing prompt-level visibility, which may enhance debugging for developers.

Semantic Kernel ​

Semantic Kernel, developed by Microsoft, aims to integrate LLMs into applications with a focus on enterprise-grade solutions.

  • Key Features:
    • Provides SDKs for connecting AI models with existing code, supporting C#, Python, and Java (Introduction to Semantic Kernel).
    • Enables automation of complex business processes, with extensibility through plugins and connectors.
    • Recent developments include experimental implementation using OpenAI Assistants API and plans to abstract the agent interface for compatibility with various models (Semantic Kernel Roadmap H1 2025).
  • Strengths:
    • Flexible and modular, designed for future-proofing with easy model swaps.
    • Backed by security features like telemetry support, suitable for enterprise needs (GitHub - microsoft/semantic-kernel).
  • Weaknesses:
    • Multi-agent support is still in development, potentially limiting complex scenarios.
    • May require more setup for developers unfamiliar with its middleware approach.
  • Real-World Use Cases:

An unexpected detail is its focus on stability, with a commitment to non-breaking changes in version 1.0+, which may appeal to enterprises seeking reliability.

AutoGen ​

AutoGen, another Microsoft project, differentiates itself as a multi-agent framework, focusing on collaboration among agents.

An unexpected detail is its community-driven development, with contributions from universities and product teams, enhancing its applicability across industries.

Comparative Analysis ​

To aid in decision-making, we compare the frameworks across key dimensions:

DimensionOpenAI's Assistant APILangChainSemantic KernelAutoGen
Development ApproachHighly automated, less controlManual configuration, high controlManual configuration, enterprise focusSpecialized for multi-agent, complex setup
FlexibilityLimited, automated natureHigh, integrates with systemsHigh, model-agnostic designHigh, multi-agent scenarios
Integration CapabilitiesLimited, basic integrationStrong, extensive SDKsStrong, enterprise connectorsStrong, complex agent tools
Multi-Agent SupportLimited, basic capabilitiesSupported via LangGraphIn development, partial supportCore feature, robust support
ObservabilityLimited, basic featuresStrong, via LangSmithIn development, basic supportLess detailed, community-driven

This table highlights the trade-offs, with LangChain and Semantic Kernel offering strong integration, while AutoGen leads in multi-agent support.

Conclusion ​

The choice of framework depends on specific project requirements and developer preferences. For rapid development with minimal configuration, OpenAI's Assistant API is suitable, especially for AI assistants and chatbots. For deep control and extensive integration, LangChain or Semantic Kernel are recommended, with LangChain excelling in observability and Semantic Kernel in enterprise stability. For complex multi-agent systems, AutoGen or LangChain with LangGraph are ideal, given their focus on collaboration.

It's worth noting that these frameworks are not mutually exclusive. Developers may benefit from combining them, such as using AutoGen with Semantic Kernel for multi-agent enterprise solutions or integrating OpenAI's Assistant API into existing LangChain setups. The field is rapidly evolving, with ongoing developments enhancing capabilities and interoperability, as seen in recent updates like AutoGen's event-driven architecture and Semantic Kernel's agent framework GA in Q1 2025.

Developers should stay informed about the latest updates, such as those on LangChain's changelog and Semantic Kernel's roadmap, to make the best choices for their projects.

Key Citations ​

Copyright © 2023 Snorkell Associates and Co